Friday, 8 July 2011
Episode three of Shameless U.S. Aunt Ginger, makes its most bold leap away from the British original yet.
Frank comes under scrutiny when a government official suspects him of cashing in social security cheques that don’t belong to him but to his 93 year old (dead) Aunt. An amusing sequence of events follow as Frank, and inevitably the whole family, attempt to find an old lady to impersonate her.
Possibly due to the fact that the show’s original creator, Paul Abbott, is on-board as executive producer, this entire plot was in keeping with the type of scenario that is typical of the U.K. Shameless, whilst being completely fresh and new.
As mentioned in my initial review of episode one, the appeal for a British audience of watching an American remake of a much loved and successful show can’t really steam much further beyond satisfying a simple curiosity. However, whether this was a deliberate aim towards attracting British viewers or not (I doubt it was), ingesting this series with sharp new angles will undoubtedly offer a broader appeal for audiences. Watching a like-for-like show, just with different faces, only serves to make the production vulnerable to negative comparisons to the U.K. version. It is easier for viewers to become frustrated with what the show isn’t rather than noticing what the show is. This brave shift away from the regimented reproduction of the original gives Shamelss U.S. a more solid texture and identity.
Continue reading at SimplyTelevision.
Wednesday, 6 July 2011
Episode two of Shameless US continues to follow the same storyline as its British counterpart. Frank Gallagher (William H Macy) goes missing… “yeah but he goes missing all the time” come the retorts, but today is disability allowance day, therefore his disappearance is actually taken seriously, he never misses it.
After a lot of worry Frank eventually turns up in Canada (it was France in the UK version). The change in location is handled well. Surprisingly the script is still almost a carbon copy of the UK Shameless, proving just how solid the writing of the original show actually is and its ability to transcend across cultures whilst retaining a solid impact. One scene in particular demonstrates this between Frank and his youngest daughter Debbie (Emma Kenny). Despite Frank’s alcoholism and inaptitude as a parent, he is the apple of Debbie's eye, and when she asks him if he took any pictures of Canada (Frank was in a police cell) he tells her he now knows “every inch”. The scene is just as touching as the UK original.
As a whole the ensemble cast of Shameless US is really coming into its own. They are all finding their feet as individual characters whilst effectively proving to be a solid family who truly care for one another.
Continue reading at Simply Television ...
Friday, 24 June 2011
J.K. Rowling, author of the Harry Potter books, has confirmed that she will not be writing any more novels about the world of Harry Potter.
At the Pottermore press conference, where the mystery behind her new website was revealed, Rowling said:
“I have no plans to write another novel. I’m pretty sure I’m done on the novel front. But it was fun while it lasted.”
Instead, she revealed that Pottermore was a new project that is purely online focused.
Fans of the wizarding world will be able to interact with the novels in more depth.
Rowling explained that she'd been hoarding extra information that would interest fans for years which has now been put onto the Pottermore website:
“I generated more material than ever appeared in the books. I thought, ‘Who would ever want to know the significance of all the difference wand woods?’ Now you can go and see. It's such a rich experience to do it this way.”
But the large build-up to the unveiling of the mysterious website has caused some frustration. Some who were expecting a ground-breaking announcement have instead branded it ‘potterbore’.
The website is also a way for the multi-million pound author to have the sole rights over Harry Potter e-books, which the site will sell exclusively in multiple languages. Rowling said:
“E-books are here and here to stay. Later than a lot of people, I for the first time downloaded e-books and it's miraculous for travel and for children in particular. I feel great about taking Harry into this new medium.”
People can register to Pottermore from 31st July, and the website will be fully launched in October.
You can see Rowling's announcement below.
What do you think? Disappointed that there will be no more books? Will you be signing up to the website?
Shameless is part of a long line of TV serials that have been noticed for their success in Britain and picked up by American producers to be remade for a U.S. audience. Other TV serials that have been adapted for the American market include The Office, Being Human, and Skins.
There is a popular notion that Americans are currently pining over anything British, whether it’s actors, singers, writers, directors, presenters, or royalty. Yet it was only about a decade ago when British drama went through a crisis of wondering why it never lived up to the standards set by the U.S. Shows such as The West Wing, 24 and The Sopranos stood on a pedestal, with their big budgets, beyond the reach of British drama.
Now it seems that the U.K. TV industry cannot help but blush at the dizzy heights of a U.S. network coming along to remake their show. After American drama has been viewed as something to aspire to, it seems that interest from across the pond is now the ultimate compliment.
But do these inherently British shows translate successfully to U.S. TV? British audiences are far more used to seeing American entertainment than the other way around and unfortunately it seems that British shows are not being given the same chance to infiltrate the American psyche to allow its audiences to relate to original British drama. Instead, it seems they have to be remade, with almost the exact same script, plot, and storyboard but with American faces, accents, and locations.
Continue reading at Simply Television ...
Wednesday, 22 June 2011
ITV have announced that they have recomissioned a new series of Lewis, starring Kevin Whately, as Inspector Lewis, and Laurence Fox as his partner, D.S.James Hathaway.
The names of three new episodes have been released as Generation of Vipers, The Age of Foolishness, and Death of the Author.
Generation of Vipers will be directed by David O’Neill (Law and Order UK) and Toby Stephens (Jane Eyre, Die Another Day) will guest star.
Rachel Bennette, Simon Block and Russell Lewis, the writers who created the original series of Lewis in 2006 as a spin off from Inspector Morse, starring John Thaw, will remain on the popular drama, writing a number of the episodes.
ITV Controller of Drama Commissioning, Sally Haynes, said:
“Lewis and Hathaway have become a formidable partnership not only in terms of cracking murder cases, but also in terms of their popularity with ITV1 viewers. We are thrilled they are returning to work on some great new stories.”
What do you think? Are you excited about these new episodes?
This article also featured on Step2inspireTV
Tuesday, 21 June 2011
The BBC have announced they are making a new Borrowers film for TV, showing on BBC one this Christmas.
The cast includes Christopher Eccleston, Stephen Fry and Victoria Wood.
The 90-minute film is an adaptation of the classic children’s novels written by Mary Norton which tell the tale of a family of ‘little people’ who live under the floor boards of ‘human beans’.
Juliette Howell, of Working Title Television, the company that will be producing the drama, spoke of the collaboration with writer Ben Vanstone who has written for Merlin and EastEnders:
"I couldn't be more thrilled with Ben's take on this classic story. It feels fresh, original and above all funny. The perfect Christmas treat."
Christopher Eccleston will play Pod Clock, farther of the borrowers family, whilst Victoria Wood plays Grandma Driver, who knows the borrowers exist in her house and is determined to hunt them out of there. Stephen Fry plays scientist Professor Mildeye who also knows of the ‘little people’s’ existence and will go to any length to capture them in order to resurrect his academic career.
Ben Stephenson, Controller of BBC Drama Commissioning, said that this is a ‘contemporary’ version of the classic tale, whilst keeping its original ‘charm’.
Filming will begin this summer for five weeks, with Tom Harper (Misfits, This is England) as director.
What do you think of the variety of talent working on this Christmas special? Who remembers Ian Holm as Pod Clock in in 1992 BBC TV serial, or more recently Jim Broadbent in the 1997 movie? How will this compare?
This article can also be found at Step2inspireTV.
Friday, 17 June 2011
Am I alone in being completely moved by this trailer?
Since they did decide to split the final installment of JK Rowling's Harry Potter and The Deathly Hallows into a two-part film, I am left wondering from this trailer why they didn't just name the second half: The Battle of Hogwarts, as that is what this final chapter will eventually be known and remembered for.
Although the deathly hallows are, of course, still present in this second part, verbal reference to them in the trailers is non-existent. Instead, attention is firmly focused on the battle (and destruction) of Hogwarts and the final duel between Harry and Voldermort.
The mystery behind what the deathly hallows actually are is eventually discovered at the end of The Deathly Hallows Part 1. How could anyone forget the spectacular piece of animation that so tentatively relayed this mythological story (click here to see that magical sequence by Ben Hibdon). So, due to the films being split, I'm sure a change in title to match the focus of each movie would not be too confusing for viewers.
|Ben Hibdon Image see an interview with the animator here.|
However, I would not attempt to argue this case beyond just making this simple short point. Possibly this was a discussion that the studios had when the films were in pre-production but inevitably the need for fidelity to the books and the reassurance for Potter fans that the books have not been 'messed with' would undoubtedly hold priority.
This principle of fidelity to the books, however, can sometimes seem like a bit of a contradiction. I completely accept that films need, yes need, to change certain aspects of the narrative created in books because a straight transposition from novel to screen, line by line, scene by scene, just doesn't work. One is an inherently visual medium, a medium for the senses, the other is an assault on the imagination through the written word. The two are not the same, and if they were there would be no point in attempting to re-tell a story so that an audience can have the liberty to experience these ideas in different forms. (For a quick insight into adaptation and how difficult a craft it can be see the exquisite film Adaptation, staring Nicolas Cage)
Yet, whilst the Harry Potter movies seem to pride themselves on achieving fidelity to the books, there are parts that deviate from the them for seemingly no reason at all (see my review of The Half Blood Prince for further reflections on this). And there is one part in all of these trailers for The Deathly Hallows Part 2 , which I'm sure will not have escaped the attention of most Potter fans, and that is when Voldermort and Harry fall together from the roof-top of Hogwarts.
I do not remember this scene from the book and, unless there appears to be a good reason for adding it in when I see the film as a whole, I will probably be oh so slightly bugged by it. I like it when films are brave enough to change material from books, but with a film like Harry Potter, which has constantly walked the fidelity line whether rightly or wrongly, it only makes it all the more glaringly obvious when a scene deviates from this stickler of a rule.
To summarise, deviation from the books is made more obvious through the consistent attempt to stick to them throughout the series. And if you're going to change anything my small suggestion would be to change the title (to The Battle of Hogwarts) one that is more fitting with the main narrative focus of, what is sadly, the final installment of Harry Potter on the big screen.
Thoughts, fans and non fans alike?